Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix I Am Spicy dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.6 (13,914)·Rose · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Copper rather than rose· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than rose · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Differences: Red rather than rose· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than rose · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than rose· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$2.99 less (25%)4.2 (2,863)
Metallic · Buildable
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Copper rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than rose· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than rose · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than rose · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Bronzed Garnet, against Maybelline Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix in I Am Spicy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeI Am SpicyClosest shade matchBronzed GarnetHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%97#95493a#934b3aLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Make Up For Ever Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick in 06 Earth, against Maybelline Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix in I Am Spicy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeI Am SpicyClosest overall alternative06 EarthHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%84#95493a#915244Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $13.01 more
Walmart