Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Ablaze dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver & gold flecks
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Champagne Sequin, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Ablaze. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAblazeClosest shade matchChampagne SequinHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#e4bfa2#e6c3a6Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Starlight Shimmer, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Ablaze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAblazeClosest overall alternativeStarlight ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#e4bfa2#ddbca3Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Overall match 90/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$9 less (26%)
