Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Oblivion dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Brown · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than brown· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than brown · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than brown· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than brown· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than brown · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Bronzey Shimmer, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Oblivion. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOblivionClosest shade matchBronzey ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%95#be9683#bf9686Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 72/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Faun, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Oblivion. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOblivionClosest overall alternativeFaunHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#be9683#c6977bClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall90
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.