Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Orgasm dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: Rosy-pink with subtle shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: dusty-pink with rose-gold sparkle
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Peach Sprinkle, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Orgasm. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOrgasmClosest shade matchPeach SprinkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#f0b3b3#efb9b5Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in You're Sweet, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Orgasm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOrgasmClosest overall alternativeYou're SweetHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%73#f0b3b3#f2bdc6Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightMediumCloseDepth difference 4.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (41%)
