Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Sparked dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Copper · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Peach rather than copper· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than copper · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
95
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format)
Differences: Pink rather than copper· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than copper · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than copper
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than copper · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: golden coral with a hint of peach
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
90
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than copper· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than copper · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than copper· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than copper · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.50 less (69%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than copper
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than copper · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Peach rather than copper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than copper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
ColourPop Chrome Liquid Eyeshadow in Bliss, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Sparked. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSparkedClosest shade matchBlissHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%88#db8983#cf8b85Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 70/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Rose Gold, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Sparked. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSparkedClosest overall alternativeRose GoldHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour60%98#db8983#d98982Looks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 81/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$9 less (26%)
