Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Wired dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Purple · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: cool-toned lavender with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than purple· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than purple · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: baby pink with green gold shift
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than purple· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than purple · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 16-hour wear· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than purple· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than purple · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver and copper pearls
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
95
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than purple· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than purple · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Copper rather than purple· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Copper rather than purple · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than purple· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than purple · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: rose quartz with a lavender shift
RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Wildflower, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Wired. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWiredClosest shade matchWildflowerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%84#ecd1dc#e7c9dbClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared35
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6016-hour wear8-hour wearSome difference8-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Overall match 68/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Blackberry Frost, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Wired. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWiredClosest overall alternativeBlackberry FrostHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%55#ecd1dc#dfd6e9Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$12 less (35%)
