Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Adults Only dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than peach· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: cream
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown rather than peach· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than peach · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 16-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than peach · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: true tan with neutral undertones
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sunkissed pink-buff with a soft golden glow
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than peach· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than peach · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
L.A. Girl 4Play Eye Shadow Quad Palette in Seduce, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Adults Only. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAdults OnlyClosest shade matchSeduceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#df9677#db9978Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall83
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 84/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Morphe ChromaPlus 12-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Flickering Sands, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Adults Only. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAdults OnlyClosest overall alternativeFlickering SandsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#df9677#d7947cVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall83
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35CreamPaletteDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 84/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $3 more
