Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Enigmatic dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Black · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Grey rather than black· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than black · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: matte deep grey with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (41%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Grey rather than black· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than black · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than black· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than black · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than black· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than black · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than black · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in GRAPHITE GLOW, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Enigmatic. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEnigmaticClosest shade matchGRAPHITE GLOWHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%83#454648#4d4f53Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 5.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlackBlackSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall26
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall72
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 66/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Waterproof Eyeshadow & Eyeliner Multi-Stick in 24 Black Matte, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Enigmatic. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEnigmaticClosest overall alternative24 Black MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%68#454648#363638Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%70Deep / darkDeep / darkSome differenceDepth difference 10.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlackBlackSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall72
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.