Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Living Sin dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Mocha Sparkle, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Living Sin. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLiving SinClosest shade matchMocha SparkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#a88274#a98473Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Adorn, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Living Sin. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLiving SinClosest overall alternativeAdornHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#a88274#a98573Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall90
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 92/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.