Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Laguna dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Bronze · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$20.01 less (59%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: deep champagne with silver flecks
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 38% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in Teddy Bear, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Laguna. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLagunaClosest shade matchTeddy BearHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#9d6751#996957Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Half Magic Sparklestik Eye Crayon in PRINCESS TEDDY, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Laguna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLagunaClosest overall alternativePRINCESS TEDDYHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#9d6751#9c6958Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall78
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Overall match 92/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.