Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick Mind Games dupes and alternatives NARS
4.4 (474)·Plum · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Purple rather than plum· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than plum · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than plum· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than plum · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than plum· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than plum · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmering soft mauve with hidden pearl
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than plum · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Slow Burn, against NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Mind Games. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMind GamesClosest matchSlow BurnHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#a45e5f#a35f63Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall83
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35CreamPaletteDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $9 more
