Colorful Eyeshadow 210 Sand Dunes dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
2.4 (584)·Nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: cool tan/beige shade with a matte finish
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: metallic copper brown with silver reflects
Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Cedar Matte, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 210 Sand Dunes. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade210 Sand DunesClosest shade matchCedar MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%93#9b6b61#956a62Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 77/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Keep It Ethereal, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 210 Sand Dunes. Matched on pan 10. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade210 Sand DunesClosest overall alternativeKeep It EtherealHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%92#9b6b61#97685bVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 84/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $30 more
Sephora
