Colorful Eyeshadow 216 Big Bang dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
2.4 (584)·Bronze · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Grey rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Silver rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Silver rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Brocade, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 216 Big Bang. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade216 Big BangClosest shade matchBrocadeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#9c7565#9d6e5bClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Scattered Light Glitter Eyeshadow in Ray, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 216 Big Bang. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade216 Big BangClosest overall alternativeRayHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%86#9c7565#927265Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 79/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $29 more
