Colorful Eyeshadow 603 Hurricane Wave dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
2.4 (584)·Grey · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Black rather than grey· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Black rather than grey · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Black rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Black rather than grey · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than grey· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than grey · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Uptown Downtown, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 603 Hurricane Wave. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade603 Hurricane WaveClosest shade matchUptown DowntownHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#61545e#615561Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared35
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Brown Sugar, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 603 Hurricane Wave. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade603 Hurricane WaveClosest overall alternativeBrown SugarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%67#61545e#53494dSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%80Deep / darkDeep / darkSome differenceDepth difference 7.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $3 more
Walmart
Sephora
