Colorful Eyeshadow 312 Soft Suede dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
2.4 (584)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than mauve· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than mauve · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than mauve· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than mauve · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than mauve · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than mauve · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: mocha brown with gold and silver pearls
Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Pink Quartz, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 312 Soft Suede. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade312 Soft SuedeClosest shade matchPink QuartzHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#80534e#79504aVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared35
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 69/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Eye Bento Bouncy Eyeshadow Trio in Chocolate Dahlia, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 312 Soft Suede. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade312 Soft SuedeClosest overall alternativeChocolate DahliaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#80534e#78524dVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPaletteCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.