Colorful Eyeshadow 222 Sweet Brownie dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
2.4 (584)·Nude · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than nude· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than nude · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: deep blackened brown with purple undertones
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmering rich walnut brown with hidden pearl
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than nude
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than nude
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: deep, rich, cool‑brown shade with sparkly dimension & a shimmer finish
Nudestix Magnetic Matte Eye Color in Cocoa, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 222 Sweet Brownie. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade222 Sweet BrownieClosest shade matchCocoaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%79#553c3f#553d39Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedOilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Cold Brew Einspanner, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 222 Sweet Brownie. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade222 Sweet BrownieClosest overall alternativeCold Brew EinspannerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%69#553c3f#543e38Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 77/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $20 more
Sephora
