Colorful Eyeshadow 213 Hollywood Calling dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
2.4 (584)·Bronze · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than bronze· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than bronze· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than bronze · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Retailer shade note: deep brown with multi colored shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than bronze · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Copper rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Copper rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than bronze· Natural rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Natural rather than glitter (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep brown with cool undertones
Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Astral Topaz, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 213 Hollywood Calling. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade213 Hollywood CallingClosest shade matchAstral TopazHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#784b35#7c513dVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared17
Finish65%13GlitterSatinDifferentSatin finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 63/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Flame + Ember, against Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 213 Hollywood Calling. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade213 Hollywood CallingClosest overall alternativeFlame + EmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%83#784b35#704839Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $29 more
