Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion 45W CHESTNUT dupes and alternatives TIRTIR
4.4 (33)·Very deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural matte rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with golden neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with warm olive undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
The closest shade to TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion 45W CHESTNUT (Very deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 64 Dark, against TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion in 45W CHESTNUT. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade45W CHESTNUTClosest shade match64 DarkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#704527#724526Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Natural Matte Foundation in 535N, against TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion in 45W CHESTNUT. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade45W CHESTNUTClosest overall alternative535NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#704527#704127Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.