Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion 55N ESPRESSO dupes and alternatives TIRTIR
4.4 (33)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deepest cool with red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep dark with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep, neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: espresso - rich brown skin with pink undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
$14.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$10.50 less (42%)4.5 (995)
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep shade with warm undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deep skin tones with a warm undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
The closest shade to TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion 55N ESPRESSO (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Natasha Denona HY-GLAM Powder Foundation in N17, against TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion in 55N ESPRESSO. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade55N ESPRESSOClosest shade matchN17How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%91#332016#341e16Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveCombinationBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 17 Neutral, against TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion in 55N ESPRESSO. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade55N ESPRESSOClosest overall alternative17 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#332016#3a2012Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 89/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $9 more
