Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion 51N FUDGE dupes and alternatives TIRTIR
4.4 (33)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with cool undertones
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (44%)3.5 (10)
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: dark or deep skin tones with an olive undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with golden neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep to rich - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
The closest shade to TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion 51N FUDGE (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Make Up For Ever Balancing & Perfecting Natural Finish Longwear Foundation in 479N Onyx, against TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion in 51N FUDGE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade51N FUDGEClosest shade match479N OnyxHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#4c2814#4a2511Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
bareMinerals BAREPRO 24HR Wear Skin-Perfecting Matte Liquid Foundation Mineral SPF 20 in Deep 65 Neutral, against TIRTIR Mask Fit AI Filter Cushion in 51N FUDGE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade51N FUDGEClosest overall alternativeDeep 65 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#4c2814#532a18Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 92/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $35 more
Walgreens
