Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than nude· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than nude · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Green rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Green rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than nude· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
57
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than nude · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Single shade, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Beige, Pls. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeige, PlsClosest shade matchSingle shadeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#c9a299#cba295Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared32
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Au Naturel, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Beige, Pls. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeige, PlsClosest overall alternativeAu NaturelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#c9a299#c9a295Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 94/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $8.50 more
