Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmer mint with pink reflects
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmering golden marshmallow
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than green· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than green · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm beige nude with silvery green & teal duo chrome finish
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 14-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 14-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$4.50 less (43%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than green· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than green · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.50 less (14%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than green· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than green· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than green · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Blue rather than green
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Blue rather than green · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than green · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$4.50 less (43%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than green
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than green · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than green
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than green · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than green· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than green · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
23
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than green
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than green · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white with an icy baby blue flip
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with gold and silver sparkle
Differences: Silver rather than green· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than green · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Lucid, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Perfect Matcha. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePerfect MatchaClosest matchLucidHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%78#ced6c2#bec9baClose colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%82LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.