Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than brown· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Plum rather than brown · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than brown· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than brown · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: golden metallic taupe with rich tawny shimmer/ holographic blushed gold with shifts of silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Silver rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Silver rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Purple rather than brown· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than brown · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Don't Touch, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Mica-Mazing. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMica-MazingClosest shade matchDon't TouchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%77#bfa3a3#caa19eClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared35
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 67/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Idôle Tint Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in 09 Strawberry Latte, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Mica-Mazing. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMica-MazingClosest overall alternative09 Strawberry LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%60#bfa3a3#d5a4a1Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared93
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall52
Longevity50%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautySame price
Walmart
