Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.50 less (14%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Silver rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Half Magic Sparklestik Eye Crayon in FAUXBOT, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Stay Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStay NeutralClosest shade matchFAUXBOTHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%98#a48279#a18178Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 66/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Transformative Taupe, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Stay Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStay NeutralClosest overall alternativeTransformative TaupeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%90#a48279#a78681Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $77.50 more
