Cream Eye Shadow Stick Cup Of Joe dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (1,248)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: mocha brown with gold and silver pearls
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.50 less (14%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: deep brown with multi colored shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: cream
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Cool, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Cup Of Joe. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCup Of JoeClosest shade matchCoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#705147#6e4f46Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 78/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Terra, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Cup Of Joe. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCup Of JoeClosest overall alternativeTerraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#705147#724b3cClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared86
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $23.50 more
