Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rosy-pink with subtle shimmer
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.50 less (33%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.50 less (14%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: baby pink with green gold shift
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Cool-toned pink with silver and pink sparkle
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 38% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
ColourPop Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow in Close to You, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in You're Sweet. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeYou're SweetClosest shade matchClose to YouHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#f2bdc6#efb7c4Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 1 of 3 compared68
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%—not comparableCreamNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance10% of overall58
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Orgasm, against Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in You're Sweet. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeYou're SweetClosest overall alternativeOrgasmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%73#f2bdc6#f0b3b3Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91MediumLightCloseDepth difference 4.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $9.50 more
