M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick Acting Natural dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,639)·Nude · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Party Trick, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Acting Natural. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeActing NaturalClosest shade matchParty TrickHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall84
Colour60%78#ddaa8d#ecb794Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%82LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall16
Finish55%4MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Opacity45%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Longevity60%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 68/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 32 Iced Latte, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Acting Natural. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeActing NaturalClosest overall alternative32 Iced LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall79
Colour60%70#ddaa8d#c79d86Close colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%78LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall70
Longevity60%9012-hour wear10-hour wearClose10-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 83/100Shade match 79/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.