M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick Flamingo dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,639)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Sheer tint rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Sheer tint rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Sheer tint rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Sheer tint rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Orange rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Orange rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Glossy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Glossy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Sheer tint rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Sheer tint rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Original Satin Lipstick in Peach Fuzz, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Flamingo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlamingoClosest shade matchPeach FuzzHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%79#ff746a#f27f6cClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared4
Finish55%4MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 63/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Petal Soft Lipstick Crayon in 320 Amélie, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Flamingo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlamingoClosest overall alternative320 AmélieHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall78
Colour60%70#ff746a#eb665aSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%77LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 8.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall69
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Overall match 81/100Shade match 78/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.