M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick Candy Yum Yum dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,639)·Pink · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (48%)4.4 (49,497)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Original Satin Lipstick in 254 Everbloom, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Candy Yum Yum. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCandy Yum YumClosest shade match254 EverbloomHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall98
Colour60%97#de457e#e13e7cLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared78
Finish55%78MatteSatinCloseSatin finish rather than matte
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline SuperStay Matte Ink Liquid Lipstick in Romantic, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Candy Yum Yum. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCandy Yum YumClosest overall alternativeRomanticHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%86#de457e#df4373Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared80
Longevity60%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 89/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Ulta BeautyCosts $11 more
Sephora
