Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow 160 Cancelled dupes and alternatives Marc Jacobs Beauty
4.3 (313)·Green · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (48%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmer mint with pink reflects
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (48%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome light green with pink reflects
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than green· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than green · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than green· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
25
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than green · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: warm beige nude with silvery green & teal duo chrome finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: emerald green to gold to teal
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than green
Score details
Shade match
20
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than green · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
26
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Augmented Reality, against Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 160 Cancelled. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade160 CancelledClosest matchAugmented RealityHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#c3ce90#c4cb96Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.