Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow 220 Mood Swing dupes and alternatives Marc Jacobs Beauty
4.3 (313)·Purple · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Blue rather than purple· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Blue rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Midnight blue metallic with indigo & baby blue shimmer/Smoky lilac with opal sparkle
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (76%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: duochrome· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: metallic vivid violet with a blue duochrome flip
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
44
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (38%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (76%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: pale periwinkle w/blue, pink & silver pinpoints
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: smoky steel metallic with gunmetal shimmer/
holographic opal foil with indigo & liliac sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: duochrome· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than purple· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than purple · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome mauve taupe with blue reflects
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
86
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: vibrant purple with silver, blue, violet and pink sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
95
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (48%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (76%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: cool-toned lavender with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than purple· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than purple · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Electric Butterfly, against Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 220 Mood Swing. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade220 Mood SwingClosest matchElectric ButterflyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#a69ec0#a29cc2Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Longevity50%4014-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.