Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow 180 Zero Chill dupes and alternatives Marc Jacobs Beauty
4.3 (313)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (76%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: White rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than silver· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than silver· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
77
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (76%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: White rather than silver· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: opalescent white w/pink, violet & blue duochrome effects
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · White rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: opalescent white with blue, pink, and purple pearl
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than silver· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer white with prismatic pearls
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Platinum, against Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 180 Zero Chill. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade180 Zero ChillClosest matchPlatinumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%86#d6d9dc#cbcdd1Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85LightLightSameDepth difference 6.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0SensitiveDryDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.