Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow 170 That's Cute dupes and alternatives Marc Jacobs Beauty
4.3 (313)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Red rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
86
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
77
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling flamingo pink with an opalescent shift
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
44
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: Cool-toned pink with silver and pink sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
NYX Professional Makeup Lid Lingerie Cream Eye Pigment in Push-Up Pink, against Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 170 That's Cute. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade170 That's CuteClosest matchPush-Up PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour60%58#f87db6#f37498Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightMediumCloseDepth difference 4.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall44
Longevity50%4814-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 14-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.