Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow 210 Clapback dupes and alternatives Marc Jacobs Beauty
4.3 (313)·Bronze · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: duochrome
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
95
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (76%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Plum rather than bronze· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
95
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Copper rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Copper rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than bronze· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than bronze · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: dusty-pink with rose-gold sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Terracotta rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Terracotta rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than bronze· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than bronze · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than bronze· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than bronze · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than bronze · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
77
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than bronze· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than bronze · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than bronze· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than bronze · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 14-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Mauve Magic, against Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 210 Clapback. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade210 ClapbackClosest shade matchMauve MagicHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#d0948c#d99691Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall65
Finish65%61DuochromeShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than duochrome
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Strawberries + Chocolate, against Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 210 Clapback. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade210 ClapbackClosest overall alternativeStrawberries + ChocolateHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%80#d0948c#ce9281Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$17 less (59%)
