Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick Bold Bubbly dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.6 (3,381)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Champagne Sequin, against IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Bold Bubbly. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBold BubblyClosest shade matchChampagne SequinHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#d9b492#e1b998Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Honey Crystal, against IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Bold Bubbly. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBold BubblyClosest overall alternativeHoney CrystalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%87#d9b492#e5be9bVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87LightLightSameDepth difference 5.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall79
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.