Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick Passionate Pearl dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.6 (3,381)·White · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than white· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than white· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Nude rather than white· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than white· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Nude rather than white· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than white· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than white· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than white · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than white· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than white · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Silver rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Morphe ChromaPlus Eyeshadow Trio in Jewel Intentions, against IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Passionate Pearl. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePassionate PearlClosest shade matchJewel IntentionsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%84#f1d5d1#fce3dfClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall74
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall58
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared20
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0SensitiveDryDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 78/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Ivory Bisque/Bronze Satin New, against IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Passionate Pearl. Matched on the Ivory Bisque pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePassionate PearlClosest overall alternativeIvory Bisque/Bronze Satin NewHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%69#f1d5d1#e9d5caSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared70
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $19 more
Sephora
