Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick Silk Armour dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.6 (3,381)·Rose · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Peach rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than rose· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than rose · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a greyish taupe with a hint of shimmer.
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Golden rather than rose· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Prada Dimensions Multi-Effect Refillable Eyeshadow Palette in 07 Peony, against IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Silk Armour. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSilk ArmourClosest shade match07 PeonyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#e4af9d#ebb2a2Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared43
Finish65%45ShimmerSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wear10-hour wearSome difference10-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 40S tearose, against IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Silk Armour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSilk ArmourClosest overall alternative40S tearoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#e4af9d#e7b199Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 93/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraSame price
