Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick Copper Charisma dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.6 (3,381)·Copper · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than copper· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than copper · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Brown rather than copper· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than copper
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Terracotta rather than copper· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than copper · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$13.01 less (52%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Rose rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than copper
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than copper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than copper· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than copper · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than copper· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than copper · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than copper· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than copper · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (28%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than copper· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than copper · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than copper· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than copper · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Terracotta rather than copper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than copper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than copper
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than copper · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 16-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than copper
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than copper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Morphe ChromaPlus 12-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Flickering Sands, against IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Copper Charisma. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCopper CharismaClosest shade matchFlickering SandsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%97#ce845f#ca8360Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 65/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Liquid Shadow in Spaced Out, against IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Copper Charisma. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCopper CharismaClosest overall alternativeSpaced OutHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%72#ce845f#c38b72Close colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100CopperCopperSameSame colour family
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.