Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Can't Dull My Shine dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Brown · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (48%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: glossy· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Glossy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than brown· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: reddish mauve with gold pearl flip
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Cream · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than brown· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than brown · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than brown · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (48%)4.4 (280,394)
Matte · Opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Cinnamon Dreamz, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Can't Dull My Shine. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCan't Dull My ShineClosest matchCinnamon DreamzHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall97
Colour60%96#76270f#782a15Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableGlossyNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall76
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $12 more
