Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Figgy dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Purple · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Berry rather than purple· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than purple · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (52%)4.2 (810)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than purple· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than purple · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than purple · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than purple · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than purple · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than purple · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than purple· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than purple · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: sheer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than purple · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Berry rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Berry rather than purple · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Violet Vaport, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Figgy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFiggyClosest matchViolet VaportHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%82#940665#9e1275Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall44
Finish55%56GlossySatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Same price
Sephora
Walgreens
