Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Gummy Bare dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$12.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.51 less (50%)4.3 (43,095)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Dior Addict Shine Lipstick in 536 Lucky, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Gummy Bare. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGummy BareClosest match536 LuckyHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall98
Colour60%97#f92c41#fc3044Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall52
Finish55%70GlossyShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Longevity60%70Long-wearing6-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 6-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Overall match 85/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $25 more
