Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Kissing Strangers dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Rose · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than rose· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than rose · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glossy· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Glossy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than rose· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than rose · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: mauve red with a matte finish
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than rose· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than rose · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glossy· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Glossy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than rose · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
RMS Beauty Legendary Serum Lipstick: The Nudes in Pamela, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Kissing Strangers. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeKissing StrangersClosest matchPamelaHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%95#6e2129#6d262aLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 82/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautySame price
Sephora
CVS
