Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Uncensored dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Brown · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glossy· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Glossy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (48%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than brown· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than brown · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Lip Oil Stick in Journey, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Uncensored. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUncensoredClosest matchJourneyHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%90#563527#503329Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableGlossyNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Longevity60%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.