Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Frienda dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than coral· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than coral · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than coral· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than coral · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (104,063)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than coral· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than coral · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than coral· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than coral · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than coral · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: sheer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than coral· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than coral · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than coral· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than coral · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Intense Volume Matte Lipstick in 163 Le Coral Irreverent, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Frienda. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFriendaClosest shade match163 Le Coral IrreverentHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%93#e5465c#e64455Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared34
Finish55%34GlossyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 75/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yves Saint Laurent Loveshine Lip Oil Stick in 12 Electric Love, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Frienda. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFriendaClosest overall alternative12 Electric LoveHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%90#e5465c#ea4464Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableGlossyNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Overall match 86/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.