Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Well, Well, Well… dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Nude · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Coral rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Laura Mercier Petal Soft Lipstick Crayon in 302 Ella, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Well, Well, Well…. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWell, Well, Well…Closest shade match302 EllaHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%91#c65e5a#bc605cVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall64
Finish55%34GlossyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%100SheerSheerSameSame sheer opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Longevity60%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yves Saint Laurent Candy Glaze Lip Gloss Stick in 15 Showcasing Nude, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Well, Well, Well…. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWell, Well, Well…Closest overall alternative15 Showcasing NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall78
Colour60%82#c65e5a#c26a66Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightMediumCloseDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%15WarmCoolDifferentCool against warm
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableGlossyNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100SheerSheerSameSame sheer opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Overall match 87/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.