Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Work Crush dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Orange · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than orange· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a hot-chili red lipstick for lips that have never looked this hot
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than orange· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Red rather than orange· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than orange· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Brown rather than orange· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than orange · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than orange· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than orange· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than orange· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Red rather than orange· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Red rather than orange· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than orange · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Tom Ford Runway Lipstick Color with Hydrating, 12H Longwear in Scarlet Rouge, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Work Crush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWork CrushClosest shade matchScarlet RougeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%94#9f2e1e#9c2e23Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 77/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Gucci Oil-In-Water Tint Hydrating Lip Stain in 308 Lucy Dark Orange, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Work Crush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWork CrushClosest overall alternative308 Lucy Dark OrangeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%81#9f2e1e#a43d2dClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88LightDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 5.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100OrangeOrangeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableGlossyNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Overall match 82/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $10 more
