Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Housewife dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Brown · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Cream · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Cream rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
16
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (48%)4.4 (280,394)
Matte · Opaque
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
16
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
16
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Chanel ROUGE COCO Longwear Satin Lipstick Hydrating and Smoothing Lip Care in 114 LOS ANGELES, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Housewife. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHousewifeClosest shade match114 LOS ANGELESHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall91
Colour60%87#7b1f18#701c19Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 71/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Westman Atelier HydroBalm Sheer Tinted Lipstick with Peptides and Hyaluronic Acid in Brique, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Housewife. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHousewifeClosest overall alternativeBriqueHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%89#7b1f18#801318Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall78
Finish55%59ShimmerSheer tintSome differenceSheer tint finish rather than shimmer
Opacity45%100SheerSheerSameSame sheer opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 78/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$18 less (72%)
