Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick Posh Pit dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Nude · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$6.49$12.99Ulta Beauty$18.51 less (74%)4.1 (18,785)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than nude· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than nude · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (52%)4.2 (810)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Satin rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
NYX Professional Makeup Lip IV Hydrating Gloss Stain in Drippin Nude, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Posh Pit. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePosh PitClosest shade matchDrippin NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%89#933b31#99423aVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableGlossyNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in Posh Pit, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Posh Pit. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePosh PitClosest overall alternativePosh PitHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall91
Colour60%86#933b31#a03a35Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall94
Finish55%89GlossySheer tintCloseSheer tint finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%100SheerSheerSameSame sheer opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $11 more
