Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick PDA dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (1,631)·Red · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a showstopping cool candy apple red to add pizzazz to your pout
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than red· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
34
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than red · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a hot-chili red lipstick for lips that have never looked this hot
L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Original Satin Lipstick in 300 Le Rouge Paris, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in PDA. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePDAClosest shade match300 Le Rouge ParisHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%95#962828#972f2eLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 80/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Gucci Long Lasting Satin Lipstick in 25* Goldie Red, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in PDA. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePDAClosest overall alternative25* Goldie RedHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%87#962828#9a131eVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared56
Finish55%56GlossySatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 82/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.