Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.50 less (37%)4.3 (1,829)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: retractable· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than coral· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than coral· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than coral · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
$4Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.50 less (58%)4.7 (446)
Matches: Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
$4Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.50 less (58%)4.7 (446)
Matches: Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: retractable· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than coral · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: retractable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
50
Visibly different colour
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof· Same format and precision: retractable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than coral · 9-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Sacheu Peel Off Lip Liner STAY-N in COREal, against Ulta Beauty Collection Automatic Retractable Lip Liner in Almond (formerly Flesh). Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAlmond (formerly Flesh)Closest matchCOREalHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%93#f78a74#ff8672Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth20%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family10%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a finish
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared40
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableRetractableNot listedNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 75/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.